Traditional environmentalism |
Modernism |
Latour’s Compositionalism, Post-environmentalism |
Humans should protect a separate nature |
Humans should dominate nature and separate themselves from nature via technology |
Humans, technology, nature are entangled, inseparable; humans & earth coextensive |
Stop intervening in nature, leave it pristine as possible |
Intervention for the sake of emancipation from nature which used to dominate us |
Emancipation, separation from nature not possible nor desirable |
Live lightly on earth |
Heavily manage nature |
Take God-like care of the human/nature integrations we’ve created |
We should try to reverse our fall from nature |
We should try to liberate ourselves from nature |
We should become ever more attached to nature |
Unintended, unwanted consequences show we need to back off our attempt to dominate/control nature |
Shocked by unintended, unwanted consequences of intervention in nature; did not take responsibility for them |
Unintended consequences are quite normal, we just need to take care of them |
Technology destroys nature |
Technology frees us from nature |
Technology leads to ever increasing intimacy with nature |
Env as “that which lies beyond and should be left alone” |
|
Env as what should be ever more managed, cared for, and internalized into fabric of society |
Likes pristine parks with humans separated from them (Yellowstone) |
|
Likes parks with humans integrated into them (villages, cows, post-offices, rural ecosystems) |
Nature needs us to leave it alone |
|
Nature needs our undivided attention, scientists, institutions, funding |
|
Mastery and possession of nature is total domination |
Mastery and possession of nature involves attachment and dependence (master depends on his slaves...) |
Sinful to want to have dominion over nature |
|
Sin is not desire for dominion over nature, but believe this involves emancipation rather than attachment |